🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Officials, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "stealing our children's youth". A law is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to enact a bill raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these services, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a solid first step," said one parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on conclusive data".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who died after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build tools that are safe and suitable for minors," said a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, legislation is largely happening at the regional level amid national inaction.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain individuals to follow Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international organizations take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and others show that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.